In this remarkably original work of political philosophy, one of today's foremost feminist theorist challenges the way contemporary society functions by questioning the standard interpretation of an idea that is deeply embedded in American and British political thought: that our rights and freedoms derive from the social contract explicated by Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau and interpreted in the United States by the Founding Fathers. The author shows how we are told only half the story of the original contract that establishes modern patriarchy. The sexual contract is ignored and thus men's patriarchal right over women is also glossed over. No attention is paid to the problems that arise when women are excluded from the original contract but incorporated into the new contractual order. One of the main targets of the book is those who try to turn contractarian theory to progressive use, and a major thesis of the book is that this is not possible. Thus those feminists who have looked to a more "proper" contract- one between genuinely equal partners, or one entered into without any coercion- are misleading themselves. In the author's words, "In contract theory universal freedom is always a hypothesis, a story, a political fiction. Contract always generates political right in the forms of domination and subordination." Thus the book is also aimed at mainstream political theorists, and socialist and other critics of contract theory. The author offers a sweeping challenge to conventional understandings- of both left and right- of actual contracts in everyday life: the marriage contract, the employment contract, the prostitution contract, and the new surrogate mother contract. By bringing a feminist perspective to bear on the contradictions and paradoxes surrounding women and contract, and the relation between the sexes, she is able to shed new light on fundamental political problems of freedom and subordination.
評分
評分
評分
評分
第一次看都為liberalism喊冤。事實是人人兩麵三刀,gender inequality不在麵子在裏子,在細節,在瞬息。而女權不就是一種咬文嚼字,一種較真,一種韌勁麼
评分第一次看都為liberalism喊冤。事實是人人兩麵三刀,gender inequality不在麵子在裏子,在細節,在瞬息。而女權不就是一種咬文嚼字,一種較真,一種韌勁麼
评分女權的勝利是話語權的勝利
评分第一次看都為liberalism喊冤。事實是人人兩麵三刀,gender inequality不在麵子在裏子,在細節,在瞬息。而女權不就是一種咬文嚼字,一種較真,一種韌勁麼
评分女權的勝利是話語權的勝利
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有