Even as the evidence of global warming mounts, the international response to this serious threat is coming unraveled. The United States has formally withdrawn from the 1997 Kyoto Protocol; other key nations are facing difficulty in meeting their Kyoto commitments; and developing countries face no limit on their emissions of the gases that cause global warming. In this clear and cogent book-reissued in paperback with an afterword that comments on recent events--David Victor explains why the Kyoto Protocol was never likely to become an effective legal instrument. He explores how its collapse offers opportunities to establish a more realistic alternative.
Global warming continues to dominate environmental news as legislatures worldwide grapple with the process of ratification of the December 1997 Kyoto Protocol. The collapse of the November 2000 conference at the Hague showed clearly how difficult it will be to bring the Kyoto treaty into force. Yet most politicians, policymakers, and analysts hailed it as a vital first step in slowing greenhouse warming. David Victor was not among them.
Kyoto's fatal flaw, Victor argues, is that it can work only if emissions trading works. The Protocol requires industrialized nations to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases to specific targets. Crucially, the Protocol also provides for so-called "emissions trading," whereby nations could offset the need for rapid cuts in their own emissions by buying emissions credits from other countries. But starting this trading system would require creating emission permits worth two trillion dollars--the largest single invention of assets by voluntary international treaty in world history. Even if it were politically possible to distribute such astronomical sums, the Protocol does not provide for adequate monitoring and enforcement of these new property rights. Nor does it offer an achievable plan for allocating new permits, which would be essential if the system were expanded to include developing countries.
The collapse of the Kyoto Protocol--which Victor views as inevitable--will provide the political space to rethink strategy. Better alternatives would focus on policies that control emissions, such as emission taxes. Though economically sensible, however, a pure tax approach is impossible to monitor in practice. Thus, the author proposes a hybrid in which governments set targets for both emission quantities and tax levels. This offers the important advantages of both emission trading and taxes without the debilitating drawbacks of each.
Individuals at all levels of environmental science, economics, public policy, and politics-from students to professionals--and anyone else hoping to participate in the debate over how to slow global warming will want to read this book.
裝幀和排版也是這本書的一大亮點,這往往是評價一本嚴肅著作時容易被忽略的細節。這本書的字體選擇非常考究,行距適中,使得長篇閱讀的疲勞感被降到瞭最低。更值得稱贊的是,書中穿插的圖錶和數據可視化處理得極為精妙。它們不是簡單地堆砌數據,而是被巧妙地整閤進文本的邏輯流之中,起到畫龍點睛的作用,幫助讀者直觀理解復雜的趨勢變化。很多時候,一個精心製作的圖錶勝過韆言萬語的文字解釋,這本書深諳此道。尤其是那些關於各國排放承諾與實際行動差距的對比圖,直觀而有力地揭示瞭其中的矛盾。這錶明作者和齣版方在製作這本書時,投入瞭極大的精力去確保知識的有效傳遞,這對於一本旨在教育公眾、啓迪思考的嚴肅作品來說,是至關重要的一環。它讓你感覺這本書的每一分錢都花在瞭刀刃上。
评分從文學性上講,作者的文字功底絕對不容小覷,他似乎擁有將枯燥的政策文件轉化為引人入勝散文的天賦。那種對環境變化影響的場景描繪,即使用最樸素的詞匯,也能勾勒齣一幅令人心悸的畫麵。我尤其記得其中一段描述瞭某個關鍵氣候峰會中,會場內外的氣氛對比,那種室內西裝革履的虛假繁榮與室外民眾抗議的真實焦慮,被他捕捉得淋灕盡緻。這種對比的運用,使得冰冷的國際政治瞬間帶上瞭濃厚的人文關懷色彩。很多時候,我感覺自己不是在閱讀一本嚴肅的非虛構作品,而是在品味一部關於人類集體意誌與惰性之間的史詩。這種敘事上的張力,使得即便是那些對國際氣候治理流程不熟悉的人,也能被其強大的代入感所吸引,從而對全球變暖議題産生更強烈的共鳴。
评分這本書的封麵設計著實引人注目,那種深沉的藍色調,配上略顯斑駁的字體,立刻就營造齣一種嚴肅而又帶有曆史厚重感的氛圍。我記得翻開第一頁時,那種紙張特有的微糙觸感,配閤著印刷清晰的文字,讓人感覺這是一部經過深思熟慮、精心打磨的作品。它不像那些快餐式的讀物,讀完就忘,而是讓你在閤上書本之後,仍舊會時不時地迴想起其中的某些論斷或描繪的圖景。作者在開篇部分並沒有急於拋齣那些令人頭疼的科學數據,反而像是以一種講故事的口吻,帶領我們進入一個宏大的敘事場景,為後續的深入探討奠定瞭一個堅實的情感基礎。這種鋪陳手法非常高明,它成功地抓住瞭那些原本可能對復雜國際政治或氣候科學不感興趣的讀者,讓他們願意繼續往下探索。特彆是對於那些初次接觸這一領域的人來說,這種溫和的引入方式無疑大大降低瞭閱讀門檻,讓人覺得即便是麵對如此沉重的主題,閱讀過程也是一種引人入勝的旅程,而不是一場枯燥的學術報告會。
评分這本書最讓我感到震撼的,是它對於“失敗”的定義和解讀。它並沒有將整個過程簡單地歸咎於某幾個“壞蛋”或某個單一的政策失誤,而是將焦點放在瞭係統性的、結構性的障礙上。作者似乎在告訴讀者,全球性問題的解決,往往不是因為缺乏好的意圖,而是因為現有的國際體係、經濟激勵機製,乃至人類認知的局限性,共同構建瞭一道難以逾越的鴻溝。讀完後,我對於“進步”這個概念都有瞭新的思考——也許真正的進步,是緩慢的、充滿反復的,並且常常以一種“不徹底的失敗”形式齣現。這種更成熟、更接近現實的視角,讓人從最初的憤懣和失望中抽離齣來,轉而開始思考如何在一個充滿缺陷的框架內,去尋求漸進式的改善,而不是一味地追求速成的、烏托邦式的解決方案。這種思想上的轉變,是閱讀這本書最寶貴的收獲之一。
评分這本書的論述結構簡直像是一件精密的瑞士鍾錶,每一個齒輪——也就是每一個章節——都咬閤得天衣無縫,共同驅動著整個復雜的論證過程。我特彆欣賞作者在處理時間綫和多方觀點時的那種老練的平衡術。他沒有采用那種非黑即白的絕對化錶達,而是細緻入微地展現瞭不同國傢、不同利益集團在特定曆史節點上的考量與博弈。當你讀到某個關鍵的外交談判段落時,你會清晰地感受到那種微妙的壓力、隱藏的動機,以及最終妥協背後的代價。這種對細節的精準捕捉,使得原本可能顯得乾癟的政策分析,變得鮮活而富有張力。它不僅僅是在記錄“發生瞭什麼”,更是在剖析“為什麼會發生”。這種深度挖掘背後的驅動力,是這本書真正價值所在的地方。讀到後來,你幾乎能把自己代入到那些決策者的位置上,去體會那種在理想與現實之間掙紮的睏境,從而對國際閤作的復雜性有瞭更深層次的理解。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有