Ruling before the Law pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

William Hurst

Cambridge University Press

2018-4-19

312

GBP 85.00

Hardcover

9781108427203

图书标签: 比较政治英文原版法学·社科法学威权主义海外中国研究中国研究中国政治社会科学

喜欢 Ruling before the Law 的读者还喜欢

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-11-23

Ruling before the Law epub 下载 mobi 下载 pdf 下载 txt 电子书下载 2024

Ruling before the Law pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

图书描述

How do legal systems actually operate outside of Western European or North American liberal democracies? To understand law and legal institutions globally, we must go beyond asking if countries comply with idealized, yet under-theorized, rule of law principles to determine how they work in practice. Examining legal regimes across different areas of criminal and civil law in both urban and rural China and Indonesia during distinct periods from 1949 to the present, William Hurst offers a new way of understanding how cases are adjudicated (and with what implications) across authoritarian, developing, post-colonial, and newly democratizing settings. This is the first systematic comparative study of the world's largest Communist and majority-Muslim nations, and the most comprehensive scholarly work in many years on the micro-level workings of either the Chinese or Indonesian legal system at the grassroots, based on a decade of research and extensive fieldwork in multiple Indonesian and Chinese provinces.

Ruling before the Law 下载 mobi epub pdf txt 电子书

著者简介

图书目录

Ruling before the Law pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

研究方法的确非常值得借鉴

评分☆☆☆☆☆

研究方法的确非常值得借鉴

评分☆☆☆☆☆

研究方法的确非常值得借鉴

评分☆☆☆☆☆

legal regime这个概念，根据政治contestation和nonlegal actor的干涉程度分了四种，动员型（强/强）rule by law（弱/弱）新传统型（弱/强）和理性多元（强/弱）。然后比较中国印尼各自四个历史时期内的城乡/民商-刑事审判算哪个legal regime，再跨国比较，现阶段印尼民商案件和中国刑事案件属于新传统，印尼刑事和中国民商属于rule by law是历史发展的结果。理论不难，用了蛮扎实的大量案例填这么多个cells。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

研究方法的确非常值得借鉴