The acclaimed and controversial historian turns his critical gaze on the writing of history today
On its publication in 2009, Shlomo Sand’s book The Invention of the Jewish People met with a storm of controversy. His demystifying approach to nationalist and Zionist historiography provoked much criticism from other professional historians, as well as praise. The furore gave him a privileged position to consider his academic discipline, which he reflects on here in Twilight of History.
Drawing on four decades in the field, Sand takes a wider view and interrogates the study of history, whose origin lay in the need for a national ideology. Over the last few decades, traditional history has begun to fragment, yet only to give rise to a new role for historians as priests of official memory. Working in Israel has sharpened Sand’s perspective, since the role of history as national myth is particularly salient in a country where the Bible is treated as a source of historical fact. He asks such questions as: Is every historical narrative ideologically marked? Do political requirements and state power weigh down inordinately on historical research and teaching? And, in such conditions, can there be a morally neutral and “scientific” truth?
Despite his trenchant criticism of academic history, Sand would still like to believe that the past can be understood without myth, and finds reasons for hope in the work of Max Weber and Georges Sorel.
Reviews
“Sand makes a convincing case against linear history, retrospectively invented continuities, anachronistic or ahistorical transpositions. He stresses the necessity of situating one’s own point of view, contextualizing and historicizing events, bringing to light bifurcations, paths not taken, contradictions and possibilities. And above all, of never sticking to the views of the dominant and the victors.”
– La Marseillaise
“Shlomo Sand asks ironically and seriously whether Clio’s days are not numbered. In Twilight of History he retraces the broad lines of humanity’s evolution and questions our relationship to antiquity and Christianity as foundations of Western civilization … Sand recalls that the discipline owes its institutionalization to the establishment of nation-states, given the task of retracing their origins and fuelling their glory, and he asks how far it can survive these.”
– Le magazine littéraire
“After Israel, it is Clio, the muse of history, who is the object of Sand’s rigorous examination, with such painful questions as whether we have to accept the impossibility of a morally neutral history. Is history not basically a ‘concealed theology,’ as Nietzsche saw it, designed to build and maintain the foundation myths of nations? At the end of an essay illuminated by personal touches, the pillars of historical self-evidence fall one after the other: Greek ‘heritage,’ Eurocentrism, arbitrary periodization. Venturing outside the carapace of his specialization, Shlomo Sand sees far, and brings a fresh breeze to arid certainties.”
– Le temps
“The Israeli historian has a magisterial work behind him. No one has better shown how a national history is fabricated and constructed on the sands of an ideology. What Shlomo Sand now offers us generalizes this argument, and we can only salute his erudite presentation of the establishment of history as a ‘science’ in the service of national passions. His chapter titles, ‘Undoing the Myth of Origins,’ ‘Escape from Politics?,’ ‘Probing the Truth of the Past’ are so many stimulating injunctions.”
– Lire
“Sand does not just make the case against a certain historical narrative, he also rumples the historians, including such contemporary icons as the founders of the Annales school, Marc Bloch and Lucien Febvre, whom he reproaches of indifference in their studies to the great political affairs of their time, Nazism, Stalinism and Judeophobia. In this time of reform of history teaching and rehabilitation of great republican myths, Shlomo Sand’s simple but indispensable message is to beware of ourselves.”
– Denis Sieffert, Politis
“Eminently readable, almost entirely free of theoretical jargon, and ... of clear importance for both politics and education.”
– Beverley Southgate, Reviews in History
Shlomo Sand studied History at the University of Tel Aviv and at the Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales in Paris. He currently teaches Contemporary History at the University of Tel Aviv. His books include The Invention of the Jewish People, On the Nation and the Jewish People, How I Stopped Being a Jew, The Invention of the Land of Israel, and Twilight of History.
评分
评分
评分
评分
我拿起这本书,是期望能看到一些关于未来走向的预测,但读完后发现,它更像是一面镜子,照出的是我们“不再相信未来”的姿态。作者的视角非常独特,他没有过多纠缠于具体的政治事件或经济波动,而是聚焦于一种深层次的“文化精神状态”的转变。他对于后现代语境下“叙事枯竭”的描述尤其精彩,仿佛我们集体失去了讲一个完整故事的能力,只能碎片化地生活在当下的即时反馈中。这种描述让人产生强烈的共鸣,因为我们确实活在信息过载却意义匮乏的时代。这本书的论证结构非常严密,每一步推理都建立在前一步坚实的基础上,尽管有时推理过于抽象,让人感觉像是纯粹的逻辑游戏。这本书的价值在于,它提供了一套全新的词汇和框架,去命名那些我们心中隐约感受到的时代疲惫感,提供了一种学术上站得住脚的悲观主义。
评分说实话,这本书的阅读体验有点像是在解一个极其复杂的古老谜题,每一个章节都是一个线索,但线索之间似乎故意设置了迷障。作者的行文节奏非常缓慢,他似乎刻意拉长了对某个关键概念的阐述时间,直到你感觉自己几乎要放弃理解时,他才轻轻地给出那个点睛之笔。我尤其欣赏他对“循环论”的重新诠释,他没有简单地重复尼采的永恒轮回,而是将其置于全球资本扩张的背景下,赋予了它一种令人不安的现代性含义。这本书的深度毋庸置疑,但它的可读性绝对是挑剔的。它要求读者拥有相当扎实的人文社科背景,否则,许多引用的对话和哲学思辨都会成为难以逾越的障碍。对于那些寻求轻松阅读的读者,我必须提出警告,这本书更像是需要“沉浸式研究”而非“随性翻阅”的文本,但一旦你投入其中,它给予的回报是极其丰厚的,让你对历史的理解提升到了一个全新的、近乎形而上的高度。
评分这本书的文笔,老实说,充满了某种古典的疏离感,仿佛作者是站在一个极高的地方俯瞰人类文明的舞台,而非身处其中。语言的雕琢达到了极致,每一个句子都像是经过精密的计算才摆放到位,充满了典故和隐喻。我常常需要停下来,反复咀嚼那些长句中蕴含的复杂逻辑关系。这绝不是一本能让你在通勤路上轻松翻阅的读物;它要求你全神贯注,甚至需要备上笔记本,梳理作者构建的庞大知识体系。我喜欢它对特定历史节点的选取,那种不拘一格的跨度,从古代的城邦政治到近代的全球化进程,他总能找到那个微妙的连接点,将看似无关的事件编织成一张巨大的网。然而,这种极度的理论化也带来了一定的阅读障碍,有时会感觉情感的温度被抽离了,剩下的是纯粹的智力博弈。对我来说,这本书更像是一次智力上的攀登,最终到达山顶时,虽然视野开阔,但过程的艰辛也让人刻骨铭心。
评分这本书简直是本思想的迷宫,初读时,我像是在一片浓雾中摸索,那些错综复杂的概念和宏大的历史叙事,一开始让人有些喘不过气。作者似乎并不满足于线性叙事,他更像是一个哲学家,不断地抛出尖锐的问题,挑战我们对“进步”和“终结”这些词汇根深蒂固的理解。我特别欣赏他对技术异化现象的剖析,那种冷静到近乎冰冷的笔触,描绘出人类在追求效率的道路上,是如何一步步将自身的存在感稀释掉的。他没有提供简单的答案,相反,他把我们引向了更深层次的焦虑——当历史的驱动力——那些宏大的意识形态——都开始退潮时,我们该如何定义当下的意义?这本书的阅读体验是沉重的,但也是极具启发性的,它迫使你放下已有的认知框架,重新审视那些被我们视为理所当然的现代性假设。我花了很长时间去消化其中关于“时间感”的论述,那种历史被拉伸、被扭曲,最终仿佛要凝固住的感受,至今仍在我脑海中回荡。
评分这本书最让我震撼的是其对“终结”概念的解构力度,它不仅仅停留在理论层面,而是通过一系列令人不安的案例研究,展示了当我们失去了“历史远景”后,社会行为会发生怎样的扭曲。作者的语气带着一种近乎先知般的冷峻,他似乎已经看到了那些我们尚未察觉到的系统性崩溃的萌芽。我发现自己对书中提到的某些社会现象,开始用一种全新的、更具批判性的眼光去看待,那些曾经被视为进步标志的东西,现在看来都带上了一层脆弱的幻象。这本书的结构非常具有目的性,每当读者感到舒适时,作者总会抛出一个强烈的反论,将我们拉回那个令人不安的现实核心。它不是一本让人感到愉悦的书,它更像是一剂清醒剂,强行将我们从对过去的怀旧和对未来的盲目乐观中拉扯出来,直面当下这片广袤的、缺乏方向感的“历史黄昏”。这本书成功地让我对许多流行的历史简化论产生了强烈的怀疑,并促使我重新思考我们所处的“后真相”时代,其深层的原因究竟何在。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有