图书标签: 社会学 政治学 宗教 海外中国研究 政治社会学 政治 中国 道家
发表于2024-11-16
Daoism and Anarchism pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
This volume in the Contemporary Anarchist Studies series focuses on anti-statist critiques in ancient and modern China and demonstrates that China does not have an unchallenged authoritarian political culture.
Treating anarchism as a critique of centralized state power, the work first examines radical Daoist thought from the 4th century BCE to the 9th century CE and compares Daoist philosophers and poets to Western anarchist and utopian thinkers. This is followed by a survey of anarchist themes in dissident thought in the People's Republic of China from 1949 to the present. A concluding chapter discusses how Daoist anarchism can be applied to any anarchist-inspired radical critique today.
This work not only challenges the usual ideas of the scope and nature of dissent in China, it also provides a unique comparison of ancient Chinese Daoist anarchism to Western anarchist. Featuring previously untranslated texts, such as the 9th century Buddhist anarchist tract, the Wunengzi, and essays from the PRC press, it will be an essential resource to anyone studying anarchism, Chinese political thought, political dissent, and political history.
John A. Rapp*, (1986), department chair, political science, professor
B.A., American University; M.A., Indiana University; Ph.D., University of Wisconsin-Madison
Phone: 608-363-2335
Email: rappja@beloit.edu
John Rapp joined the faculty at Beloit College in 1986 where he teaches courses in comparative politics. He founded the Asian Studies program in 1987 and served as its chair for ten years. He also served as chair of the Political Science department from 1996-1999 and again starting in 2014. From 2002-2005 he served as Director of Asian Studies Programming under the first installment of Beloit's Freeman Foundation grant. In 1988-89 he was interim director of the Center for Language Studies, Beloit's summer intensive language program.
His primary teaching interests include Chinese politics, Communist and post-Communist systems, comparative democracies and electoral systems, and Chinese and comparative political thought. Besides his regular comparative politics offerings, he teaches courses on comparative revolutions, dissent, anarchism, and political fiction.
In March 2005 he led a faculty-staff study tour to Hong Kong and Guangdong in the People's Republic of China. In May 2006 he participated in a Beloit faculty-staff study tour to Hungary, and in the summer of 2007 he joined a faculty-staff travel group to China to help inaugurate Beloit's two new exchange programs in Kaifeng and Jinan. He also taught a concentrated mini-course on German politics at Beloit’s former exchange program in Hamburg, Germany in 1999. He has been selected to participate in several seminars for college professors over the years, including CIEE Faculty Development Seminars in Berlin (June 1990) and Hong Kong (1992), as well as the American Political Science Association (APSA) seminar on Japanese Politics (August 1990). His awards include the Beloit College Mouat Chair for Younger Faculty in International Studies from 1992-96, a faculty sabbatical grant to the University of Michigan in 1992-93 from the Program on Inter-institutional Collaboration in Area Studies (PICAS); a National Endowment for the Humanities Reading Grant for Private College Faculty (which included travel to Hungary) in May-June 1990; and a Pacific Cultural Foundation (PCF) Faculty Research Grant for the Fall of 2000.
His publications include the books Daoism and Anarchism: Critiques of State Autonomy in Anciewnt and Mdoern China (NY and London: Bloomsbury Press, 2012) and Autocracy and China's Rebel Founding Emperors: Comparing Chairman Mao and Ming Taizu (coauthored with Anita Andrew) (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Press, 2000). His published articles and book chapters include “Anarchism or Nihilism?: The Buddhist-Influenced Thought of Wu Nengzi,” in Alexandre Christoyannopoulos (ed.), Religious Anarchism: New Perspectives(Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009); “Daoism as Utopian or Accommodationist: Radical Daoism Reexamined in Light of the Guodian Manuscripts,” in Laurence Davis and Ruth Kinna (eds.), Anarchism and Utopianism (University of Manchester Press, 2009); “Clashing Dilemmas: Hong Rengan, Issachar Roberts, and a Taiping ‘Murder’ Mystery,” Journal of Historical Biography 4 (Autumn 2008): 27-58, online at http://www.ufv.ca/jhb/Volume_4/Volume_4_Rapp.pdf; “Utopian, Anti-Utopian, and Dystopian Ideas in Philosophical Daoism,” Comparative Asian Development 2:2 (Fall 2003): 211-231; “Maoism and Anarchism: Mao Zedong's Response to the Anarchist Critique of Marxism,” Anarchist Studies 9 (2001): 3-28; “Daoism and Anarchism Reconsidered,”Anarchist Studies 6: 2 (October1998): 123-152; and “The Fate of Marxist Democrats in Leninist Party-States:China's Debate on the Asiatic Mode of Production,” Theory and Society16 (1987): 709-740. He is currently working on a biography project on Issachar J.Roberts, the 19th century southern Baptist China missionary who served as mentor and advisor to the leaders of China’s Taiping rebellion.
时间关系泛读,有趣,但过分借题发挥。从道教思想追溯中国无政府主义和反国家主义的起源(貌似一些自由意志主义者也喜这手?),非暴力非革命乌托邦(及反乌托邦)思维。近现代不论精粗引入西方政治思想导致中国无政府主义思潮兴起,五四前后无政府与马克思主义竞合,在毛泽东身上体现得尤为明显,持续革命论与阶级专政论、暴力革命论与人民权力论的张力,最终在文革中内爆,鼓动造反派清除限制个人能动性的党国机构,但又最终扼杀各种比自己更激进更要求共党下台的青年组织,而文革中部分青年和组织(如湖南省无联,杨小凯)实际已几乎走上早期无政府主义者道路。1981年前后西单冥猪墙则是最后一波无政府思潮的短暂开放。此数点均可结合吴一庆书细读。最后在儒家加中国特色马克思复兴的当代中国,道教与西方无政府思想能否合流进击?
评分时间关系泛读,有趣,但过分借题发挥。从道教思想追溯中国无政府主义和反国家主义的起源(貌似一些自由意志主义者也喜这手?),非暴力非革命乌托邦(及反乌托邦)思维。近现代不论精粗引入西方政治思想导致中国无政府主义思潮兴起,五四前后无政府与马克思主义竞合,在毛泽东身上体现得尤为明显,持续革命论与阶级专政论、暴力革命论与人民权力论的张力,最终在文革中内爆,鼓动造反派清除限制个人能动性的党国机构,但又最终扼杀各种比自己更激进更要求共党下台的青年组织,而文革中部分青年和组织(如湖南省无联,杨小凯)实际已几乎走上早期无政府主义者道路。1981年前后西单冥猪墙则是最后一波无政府思潮的短暂开放。此数点均可结合吴一庆书细读。最后在儒家加中国特色马克思复兴的当代中国,道教与西方无政府思想能否合流进击?
评分时间关系泛读,有趣,但过分借题发挥。从道教思想追溯中国无政府主义和反国家主义的起源(貌似一些自由意志主义者也喜这手?),非暴力非革命乌托邦(及反乌托邦)思维。近现代不论精粗引入西方政治思想导致中国无政府主义思潮兴起,五四前后无政府与马克思主义竞合,在毛泽东身上体现得尤为明显,持续革命论与阶级专政论、暴力革命论与人民权力论的张力,最终在文革中内爆,鼓动造反派清除限制个人能动性的党国机构,但又最终扼杀各种比自己更激进更要求共党下台的青年组织,而文革中部分青年和组织(如湖南省无联,杨小凯)实际已几乎走上早期无政府主义者道路。1981年前后西单冥猪墙则是最后一波无政府思潮的短暂开放。此数点均可结合吴一庆书细读。最后在儒家加中国特色马克思复兴的当代中国,道教与西方无政府思想能否合流进击?
评分时间关系泛读,有趣,但过分借题发挥。从道教思想追溯中国无政府主义和反国家主义的起源(貌似一些自由意志主义者也喜这手?),非暴力非革命乌托邦(及反乌托邦)思维。近现代不论精粗引入西方政治思想导致中国无政府主义思潮兴起,五四前后无政府与马克思主义竞合,在毛泽东身上体现得尤为明显,持续革命论与阶级专政论、暴力革命论与人民权力论的张力,最终在文革中内爆,鼓动造反派清除限制个人能动性的党国机构,但又最终扼杀各种比自己更激进更要求共党下台的青年组织,而文革中部分青年和组织(如湖南省无联,杨小凯)实际已几乎走上早期无政府主义者道路。1981年前后西单冥猪墙则是最后一波无政府思潮的短暂开放。此数点均可结合吴一庆书细读。最后在儒家加中国特色马克思复兴的当代中国,道教与西方无政府思想能否合流进击?
评分时间关系泛读,有趣,但过分借题发挥。从道教思想追溯中国无政府主义和反国家主义的起源(貌似一些自由意志主义者也喜这手?),非暴力非革命乌托邦(及反乌托邦)思维。近现代不论精粗引入西方政治思想导致中国无政府主义思潮兴起,五四前后无政府与马克思主义竞合,在毛泽东身上体现得尤为明显,持续革命论与阶级专政论、暴力革命论与人民权力论的张力,最终在文革中内爆,鼓动造反派清除限制个人能动性的党国机构,但又最终扼杀各种比自己更激进更要求共党下台的青年组织,而文革中部分青年和组织(如湖南省无联,杨小凯)实际已几乎走上早期无政府主义者道路。1981年前后西单冥猪墙则是最后一波无政府思潮的短暂开放。此数点均可结合吴一庆书细读。最后在儒家加中国特色马克思复兴的当代中国,道教与西方无政府思想能否合流进击?
评分
评分
评分
评分
Daoism and Anarchism pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024