This is the 1908 book that started it all in the 20th century, the book that kicked off a century of anti-state, pro-property writing. This was the prototype for Nock's writing, for Chodorov's work, and even the theoretical edifice that later became Rothbardianism.
Indeed, Franz Oppenheimer wrote what remains one of the most bracing and stimulating volumes in the history of political philosophy. The author sought to overthrow centuries of fallacious thinking on the subject of the state's origin, nature, and purpose, put its it place a view of the state that constitutes a foundational attack on the structure of modern society.
He utterly demolishes the social-contract view of the state as it had been advanced by most thinkers since the Enlightenment. He seeks to replace that view with a realistic assessment of the state, one that can only make anyone with statist leanings squirm: he sees the state as composed of a victorious group of bandits who rule over the defeated group with the purpose of domination and exploitation. It achieves its status through a form of conquest, secures its power through relentless aggression, and sees its main function is to secure its status and power.
Consider that when this book was written such views were a scandal, especially in Germany. Oppenheimer, who was a medical doctor who became a professor of sociology, suffered terribly for his libertarian views. Then this book appeared, which stunned even his most vociferous critics with its analytical rigor, historical sweep, and steely resolve. The book has since appeared in more than a dozen languages. In a world that cared about ideas, this would be required reading in political philosophy.
From an economic point view, his analysis holds up even where his language about capitalism and socialism can be somewhat confused. In fact, it was Rothbard's own work that took Oppenheimer's theory and fit it into a free-market framework. But to fully understand the state theory behind modern Austro-libertarian thinking, this work is indispensable.
Of this still under-appreciated classic, Murray Rothbard writes:
The great German sociologist Franz Oppenheimer (1864-1943), who wrote this magnificent little book called The State, put the case brilliantly.
In essence, he said, there are only two ways for men to acquire wealth. The first method is by producing a good or a service and voluntarily exchanging that good for the product of somebody else. This is the method of exchange, the method of the free market; it’s creative and expands production; it is not a zero-sum game because production expands and both parties to the exchange benefit. Oppenheimer called this method the "economic means" for the acquisition of wealth.
The second method is seizing another person’s property without his consent, i.e., by robbery, exploitation, looting. When you seize someone’s property without his consent, then you are benefiting at his expense, at the expense of the producer; here is truly a zero-sum "game"--not much of a "game," by the way, from the point of view of the victim. Instead of expanding production, this method of robbery clearly hobbles and restricts production. So in addition to being immoral while peaceful exchange is moral, the method of robbery hobbles production because it is parasitic upon the effort of the producers.
With brilliant astuteness, Oppenheimer called this method of obtaining wealth "the political means." And then he went on to define the state, or government, as "the organization of the political means," i.e., the regularization, legitimation, and permanent establishment of the political means for the acquisition of wealth.
In other words, the state is organized theft, organized robbery, organized exploitation. And this essential nature of the state is highlighted by the fact that the state ever rests upon the crucial instrument of taxation.
This book is classic, with an introduction by Paul Gottfried. It is on the must-read list of every libertarian in every generation.
A classic, and still under-appreciated. Murray Rothbard writes: The great German sociologist Franz Oppenheimer (1864-1943), who wrote this magnificent little book called The State, put the case brilliantly. In essence, he said, there are only two ways for ...
评分A classic, and still under-appreciated. Murray Rothbard writes: The great German sociologist Franz Oppenheimer (1864-1943), who wrote this magnificent little book called The State, put the case brilliantly. In essence, he said, there are only two ways for ...
评分A classic, and still under-appreciated. Murray Rothbard writes: The great German sociologist Franz Oppenheimer (1864-1943), who wrote this magnificent little book called The State, put the case brilliantly. In essence, he said, there are only two ways for ...
评分A classic, and still under-appreciated. Murray Rothbard writes: The great German sociologist Franz Oppenheimer (1864-1943), who wrote this magnificent little book called The State, put the case brilliantly. In essence, he said, there are only two ways for ...
评分A classic, and still under-appreciated. Murray Rothbard writes: The great German sociologist Franz Oppenheimer (1864-1943), who wrote this magnificent little book called The State, put the case brilliantly. In essence, he said, there are only two ways for ...
这本书的后记部分,处理得异常高明。通常情况下,后记只是对全书内容的简单总结,或是对未来研究方向的展望,但在这本书中,后记更像是一次作者对读者的“真诚托付”。它没有急于收尾,而是将一个开放式的、极具挑战性的伦理困境抛了出来,这个问题与全书的核心论点紧密相关,但解答权却完全交还给了读者。这种处理方式,使得整本书的重量感和持续性被大大增强了。它没有提供一个现成的乌托邦蓝图,也没有预言必然的悲剧结局,而是用一种近乎诗意的警示,提醒我们:认知世界的复杂性,只是第一步,真正的挑战在于如何在认知的基础上,选择前行的路径。读完之后,我没有感到如释重负,反而有一种沉甸甸的责任感,这本书的价值在于,它成功地将一场智力上的阅读体验,转化成了一场深刻的、持续性的自我反思和对我们共同未来的关切。
评分我特别欣赏作者在构建其论述体系时所展现出的那种跨学科的视野。这不是一本孤立的学术作品,它就像一个巨大的知识熔炉,将人类学、经济学模型、心理学实验数据以及历史编年史有机地熔铸在一起。例如,在分析资源分配不均引发的社会张力时,作者引用了某个早期部落的狩猎分配规则,然后无缝衔接到现代金融衍生品的风险评估模型上,这种跨越数千年的对比,不仅没有显得突兀,反而揭示了在不同技术背景下,人类应对稀缺性的底层逻辑似乎从未改变。这种广博的知识储备,让我的阅读体验充满了不断发现新大陆的惊喜感。我常常需要停下来,去查阅书中提到的那些冷僻的术语或未曾谋面的历史人物,但这种“查阅”的过程本身,也构成了阅读体验中不可或缺的一部分,它极大地拓展了我知识地图的边界,让我感到自己仿佛在与一位学识渊博的智者进行着一场漫长的对话。
评分这本书的封面设计,那种深沉的墨绿色调,配上烫金的字体,一下就抓住了我的眼球。拿到手里沉甸甸的,一股历史的厚重感扑面而来,光是掂量着,我就能感受到作者在构建这个宏大叙事时所倾注的心血。我一直对那种宏观视角下的社会变迁和权力运作机制充满好奇,而这本书的排版和装帧,预示着它绝不是一本轻松的读物,它要求读者放下浮躁,沉浸其中。内页的纸张质感也很不错,阅读起来不累眼,这对于需要长时间面对文字的深度阅读者来说,简直是福音。装帧上采用的线装工艺,让我每次翻页时都有一种仪式感,仿佛在揭开一层层历史的帷幕。而且,扉页上那句引言,虽然我无法在此复述其具体内容,但它以一种极为精炼和富有哲理的方式,为整本书定下了基调,那种对人类集体行为的深刻洞察,让人在尚未进入正文之前,就已经对即将到来的阅读旅程充满了敬畏和期待。这不仅仅是一本书,更像是一个精心制作的艺术品,展示了出版商对内容的尊重和对读者的诚意。
评分这本书最令人震撼的,莫过于它对“集体无意识”的描绘,那种笔触之细腻,简直像是能穿透时间缝隙,直抵人心最深处的幽暗角落。我记得某一章节,作者分析了社会共识是如何在潜移默化中形成并固化为一种无法撼动的“常态”时,我简直惊出了一身冷汗。它并非简单地指责某种制度的弊端,而是深入探讨了构成这种制度的个体心理基础——那种对安全感的渴求,对不确定性的恐惧,以及对“被接纳”的本能需求。作者没有给出简单的“是”或“否”的答案,而是将这些复杂的心理驱动力像解剖青蛙一样,细致地摊开在读者面前,让人不得不直面自身行为背后的那些隐秘动机。这种对人性的深刻洞察,使得这本书超越了一般的社会学或政治学著作,具备了近乎文学的穿透力和哲学的高度。每次合上书页,那种被“看穿”的感觉久久萦绕不去,它迫使我重新审视自己过去对许多既定事实的盲目接受。
评分阅读这本书的过程,对我而言,简直是一场智力上的马拉松,节奏把握得极好,张弛有度。初读几章时,作者似乎有意设置了一些略显晦涩的理论铺垫,那些概念的引入,如同在广袤的草原上建立起初始的坐标系,虽然有些吃力,但一旦适应了那种思维的跳跃性,便会发现其逻辑的严密性简直令人叹为观止。尤其是在论述不同历史阶段的组织结构演变时,作者巧妙地穿插了大量旁征博引的案例,这些案例的选取,既有古典文明的典范,也不乏近现代的警示,使得抽象的理论瞬间变得鲜活而具象。我发现自己不得不频繁地使用荧光笔和笔记本来梳理那些错综复杂的因果关系链,这种主动的参与感,远比被动接受信息来得令人满足。更值得称道的是,即便在讨论最复杂的问题时,作者的行文风格依然保持着一种冷静而克制的叙事腔调,没有丝毫煽情或过度渲染,完全是基于事实和逻辑的层层递进,这才是真正的高级思辨。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有