圖書標籤: SJC  神學  宗教  哲學  中世紀  SJC.SO  PHIL  Hamalaya   

喜歡 Proslogion, with the Replies of Gaunilo and Anselm 的讀者還喜歡

典型的中世紀“上帝存在”證明。默認基督教上帝是常態，嚮上遞歸。在我等看來沒有什麼說服力。

ontological argument乍一看精妙，實際上搖搖欲墜。因為隨之而來的是omnipotence和有所不為的衝突，mercifulness和impassibility/justice的衝突。Anselm意識到瞭種種問題，卻無力解決，最後隻能說，神不可完全理解。

ontological argument乍一看精妙，實際上搖搖欲墜。因為隨之而來的是omnipotence和有所不為的衝突，mercifulness和impassibility/justice的衝突。Anselm意識到瞭種種問題，卻無力解決，最後隻能說，神不可完全理解。

ontological argument乍一看精妙，實際上搖搖欲墜。因為隨之而來的是omnipotence和有所不為的衝突，mercifulness和impassibility/justice的衝突。Anselm意識到瞭種種問題，卻無力解決，最後隻能說，神不可完全理解。

ontological argument乍一看精妙，實際上搖搖欲墜。因為隨之而來的是omnipotence和有所不為的衝突，mercifulness和impassibility/justice的衝突。Anselm意識到瞭種種問題，卻無力解決，最後隻能說，神不可完全理解。

阅读课思考，英文很烂，和有耐心读的分享下。 Open Question on Seminar of 19th.Jan: Why belief is enough? How could we better understand the relationship between belief and understanding? In this book, God’s existence is proved in Chapter 2, 3 and 4. In ...

阅读课思考，英文很烂，和有耐心读的分享下。 Open Question on Seminar of 19th.Jan: Why belief is enough? How could we better understand the relationship between belief and understanding? In this book, God’s existence is proved in Chapter 2, 3 and 4. In ...

阅读课思考，英文很烂，和有耐心读的分享下。 Open Question on Seminar of 19th.Jan: Why belief is enough? How could we better understand the relationship between belief and understanding? In this book, God’s existence is proved in Chapter 2, 3 and 4. In ...

阅读课思考，英文很烂，和有耐心读的分享下。 Open Question on Seminar of 19th.Jan: Why belief is enough? How could we better understand the relationship between belief and understanding? In this book, God’s existence is proved in Chapter 2, 3 and 4. In ...

阅读课思考，英文很烂，和有耐心读的分享下。 Open Question on Seminar of 19th.Jan: Why belief is enough? How could we better understand the relationship between belief and understanding? In this book, God’s existence is proved in Chapter 2, 3 and 4. In ...