Andrey botvinnik: a Russian diplomat, he is urbane humorous and cynical. Meanwhile he is very good at diverting topics when someone talked about sensitive topics. He has been in Geneva negotiating with Americans for quite a long time.
John honeyman: an American negotiator who is sent to negotiate with andrey botvinnik after the former negotiator Mr. mcintyre was resigned. He is a newcomer to the negotiation table and an idealist who wants to realize reducing nuclear missiles with his efforts.
In the woods on the outskirts of Geneva, an American and a Russian arms negotiator meet informally after long talks at the bargaining table. The Russian, Botvinnik, who has worked in Geneva as a negotiator for several years and knows what results the talks can bring about. Honeyman, his American counterpart, is a newcomer to the negotiation table and an idealist and deeply believes the value of hard, honest bargaining. As the seasons change and the arms talks drag on, the two men continue their meetings in the woods and through their absorbing conversations we sense the growing understanding and mutual admiration developing between the two, and also the increasing frustration which confines them both. Botvinnik finally agreed with honeyman’s proposal and both of them hand that proposal to their governments. Unfortunately, they are rejected at the same time for the reason that this proposal is too perfect to pass. Botvinnik seems to know this result before based on his rich experiences in negotiating but honeyman is hard to accept this result. Both of them feel very frustrated of this negotiation.
The play is based on the actual peace talks held in Geneva in 1982, when American Paul H. Nitze and Russian Yuli A. Kvitsinsky got up from their bargaining tables and took an off-the-record “walk in the woods.”
It seems that both countries reached a conclusion to reduce the missiles to some extent in reality unlike the frustrating results in the play. Except the real wars, the negotiating table is the other battlefield where different countries fight for their int...
评分It seems that both countries reached a conclusion to reduce the missiles to some extent in reality unlike the frustrating results in the play. Except the real wars, the negotiating table is the other battlefield where different countries fight for their int...
评分It seems that both countries reached a conclusion to reduce the missiles to some extent in reality unlike the frustrating results in the play. Except the real wars, the negotiating table is the other battlefield where different countries fight for their int...
评分It seems that both countries reached a conclusion to reduce the missiles to some extent in reality unlike the frustrating results in the play. Except the real wars, the negotiating table is the other battlefield where different countries fight for their int...
评分It seems that both countries reached a conclusion to reduce the missiles to some extent in reality unlike the frustrating results in the play. Except the real wars, the negotiating table is the other battlefield where different countries fight for their int...
这本作品最让我印象深刻的是它对“孤独”主题的处理,它不是那种矫揉造作的悲情描写,而是一种基于环境压力的、近乎本能的生存状态。作者用极其冷静甚至有些疏离的笔触,描绘了角色们在广阔天地中如何应对突如其来的恐惧与自我怀疑。我尤其喜欢他对天气和气候的拟人化描写,那些突如其来的暴风雪、连绵不绝的阴雨,不仅仅是背景,它们本身就是角色的对手,是推动情节发展的无形力量。这种环境与人的互动张力,构筑了本书最坚实的骨架。在阅读过程中,我不断地在思考,在如此极端的条件下,我们通常引以为傲的文明和理性会剩下多少?书中对生存技能的描述也相当详尽,虽然我本人可能永远不会用到,但那种对知识和经验的尊重,让我对那些身处蛮荒之地的先行者油生敬意。这是一部关于人类如何在看似荒芜之地重建内心秩序的史诗,朴实无华,却力量无穷。
评分老实说,这本书的开篇着实让我有些摸不着头脑,它的切入点非常独特,不像传统小说那样直接抛出主要矛盾。作者似乎更倾向于用一种碎片化的方式来构建世界观,大量的内心独白和对周围环境的细致观察交织在一起,让人感觉像是在看一部意识流的电影。我一度需要频繁地回翻前面的章节,才能将零散的信息点串联起来,理解人物动机的深层逻辑。然而,一旦熬过了最初的适应期,作品的魅力便如潮水般涌来。它展示了一种对“徒劳”的迷恋,角色们似乎在做着注定不会有完美结局的努力,但恰恰是这种不完美,赋予了他们的行为以崇高的意义。特别是书中关于“坚持”的论述,没有使用任何空洞的口号,而是通过具体的行动展现了何为真正的韧性。这本书不适合那些寻求即时满足的读者,它更像是为那些愿意花时间去解构、去品味文字背后深层哲学意图的“老饕”准备的。
评分这本书的语言风格有一种令人着迷的韵律感,仿佛作者在创作时,脑海中一直回荡着某种古老的民谣。它并非华丽辞藻的堆砌,而是通过精妙的句式结构和反复出现的意象,营造出一种近乎催眠的阅读节奏。比如,他对“时间”流逝的描述,不是简单地记录日期,而是将其与河流的枯荣、树木的年轮联系起来,构成了一种循环往复的宇宙观。我发现自己开始留意生活中的微小变化,试图用作者那种诗意的眼光去看待日常。书中穿插的那些关于历史变迁的片段,虽然看似与主线略有脱节,却起到了绝佳的烘托作用,让读者意识到个体生命的渺小与短暂。这本书最成功的地方在于,它成功地将“远行”这一行为,从单纯的地理位移,提升到了一种精神上的洗礼。合上书本的那一刻,心中涌起的不是故事结束的失落,而是一种被重新校准的平静,仿佛刚刚完成了一次深刻的冥想。
评分这本书的叙事节奏简直像夏日午后的微风,轻盈却又带着一种不经意的深刻。作者的文字功底极其扎实,尤其擅长捕捉那些转瞬即逝的自然景象和人物内心微妙的情绪波动。读到他描述穿越一片古老森林时的那种光影变化,我仿佛能闻到泥土的湿润气息和松针的清香。他笔下的人物并非脸谱化的英雄或恶棍,而是一群行走在自我与自然边缘的复杂个体。特别是其中一位角色,那种对既定生活的疏离感和对未知旅途的近乎固执的追求,让人不禁反思自己是否也曾被世俗的枷锁束缚。全书的结构处理得非常巧妙,时而插入一些历史的典故或哲学性的思考,使得原本可能平淡无奇的行程,立刻被赋予了更宏大的意义。阅读体验是沉浸式的,我常常读到某个特别有画面感的段落时,会不自觉地停下来,闭上眼睛,在脑海中描摹那个场景,仿佛自己就是那个正在跋涉的旅人。这本书的魅力不在于跌宕起伏的故事情节,而在于它提供了一种慢下来的视角,引导读者重新审视我们与周遭环境的关系。
评分我必须承认,这本书的阅读难度比我预期的要高一些,它不是那种能让你一口气读完的爆米花小说。相反,它更像是一块需要细细品味的陈年佳酿,每一口都需要你投入百分之百的专注力。作者对于环境的细节描写到了近乎偏执的程度,我怀疑他是不是将每一个岩石的纹理、每一声鸟鸣的频率都记录了下来。这种写实到极致的手法,虽然偶尔会打断叙事的流畅性,但却极大地增强了文本的质感。书中对人际关系的处理也十分克制和精准,那些未说出口的话语和眼神的交汇,往往比大段的对白更能揭示人物的真实处境。我特别欣赏作者那种毫不留恋地揭示人性弱点的勇气,他没有美化任何一方,展现的是真实、粗粝,甚至是有些令人不适的互动。对我而言,这本书更像是一次智力上的挑战,它要求读者主动去填补那些留白,去构建属于自己的理解。读完后,我感觉自己不是读完了一个故事,而是完成了一次艰苦卓绝的脑力攀登,收获的不仅仅是故事的结局,更多的是对叙事艺术新的认识。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有