图书标签: 非虚构  法国  PierreBayard  AgathaChristieStudy   

喜欢 Who Killed Roger Ackroyd? 的读者还喜欢

I can look past the gratuitous psychoanalysis but was really put off by the author's hypocrisy of coming up with some dubious arguments against the original solution while totally ignoring the fact that some of the arguments also refute his own theory

3.5 同为阿加莎粉的老师大力安利。我反正绝对不可能看任何书看到作者这种深度，很多细微处想必阿加莎自己也未见得意识到。但搞理论的人到底严谨，不仅作出了有意义的质疑和出色的演绎推理，还把阿加莎的写作技法和故事形态仔仔细细梳理了一番，重点作品讲解过瘾好看（同时也全是剧透，没看过书的会被从头到尾透成筛子）。中段讲delusional reading的一大部分看得很懵，一些评论说可能要结合他其他作品才能完全搞懂。

3.5 同为阿加莎粉的老师大力安利。我反正绝对不可能看任何书看到作者这种深度，很多细微处想必阿加莎自己也未见得意识到。但搞理论的人到底严谨，不仅作出了有意义的质疑和出色的演绎推理，还把阿加莎的写作技法和故事形态仔仔细细梳理了一番，重点作品讲解过瘾好看（同时也全是剧透，没看过书的会被从头到尾透成筛子）。中段讲delusional reading的一大部分看得很懵，一些评论说可能要结合他其他作品才能完全搞懂。

I can look past the gratuitous psychoanalysis but was really put off by the author's hypocrisy of coming up with some dubious arguments against the original solution while totally ignoring the fact that some of the arguments also refute his own theory

I can look past the gratuitous psychoanalysis but was really put off by the author's hypocrisy of coming up with some dubious arguments against the original solution while totally ignoring the fact that some of the arguments also refute his own theory