图书标签: 文化研究 社会學 流行文化 資產階級 美國 美国文化等级的出现 歷史 文学批评读物
发表于2024-11-15
Highbrow/Lowbrow pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
In this unusually wide-ranging study, spanning more than a century and covering such diverse forms of expressive culture as Shakespeare, Central Park, symphonies, jazz, art museums, the Marx Brothers, opera, and vaudeville, a leading cultural historian demonstrates how variable and dynamic cultural boundaries have been and how fragile and recent the cultural categories we have learned to accept as natural and eternal are. For most of the nineteenth century, a wide variety of expressive forms--Shakespearean drama, opera, orchestral music, painting and sculpture, as well as the writings of such authors as Dickens and Longfellow--enjoyed both high cultural status and mass popularity. In the nineteenth century Americans (in addition to whatever specific ethnic, class, and regional cultures they were part of) shared a public culture less hierarchically organized, less fragmented into relatively rigid adjectival groupings than their descendants were to experience. By the twentieth century this cultural eclecticism and openness became increasingly rare. Cultural space was more sharply defined and less flexible than it had been. The theater, once a microcosm of America--housing both the entire spectrum of the population and the complete range of entertainment from tragedy to farce, juggling to ballet, opera to minstrelsy--now fragmented into discrete spaces catering to distinct audiences and separate genres of expressive culture. The same transition occurred in concert halls, opera houses, and museums. A growing chasm between "serious" and "popular," between "high" and "low" culture came to dominate America's expressive arts. "If there is a tragedy in this development," Levine comments, "it is not only that millions of Americans were now separated from exposure to such creators as Shakespeare, Beethoven, and Verdi, whom they had enjoyed in various formats for much of the nineteenth century, but also that the rigid cultural categories, once they were in place, made it so difficult for so long for so many to understand the value and importance of the popular art forms that were all around them. Too many of those who considered themselves educated and cultured lost for a significant period--and many have still not regained--their ability to discriminate independently, to sort things out for themselves and understand that simply because a form of expressive culture was widely accessible and highly popular it was not therefore necessarily devoid of any redeeming value or artistic merit." In this innovative historical exploration, Levine not only traces the emergence of such familiar categories as highbrow and lowbrow at the turn of the century, but helps us to understand more clearly both the process of cultural change and the nature of culture in American society.
劳伦斯•W. 莱文(1933—2006)
毕业于纽约城市学院,后在哥伦比亚大学获得历史学硕士和博士学位。曾任教于普林斯顿大学、加州大学伯克利分校和乔治•梅森大学,1985年入选美国艺术与科学学院院士,1992至1993年任美国历史学会主席。以美国多元文化为研究中心,美国黑人文化和社会思潮为主要研究对象,用史实依据倡导大众在历史学研究中的观点。著述广泛,曾获麦克阿瑟基金会天才奖、古根海姆纪念基金会颁发的杰出人物奖、美国历史研究会颁发的杰出人物奖等。
灰常有意思,前一半讲的就是莎士比亚戏剧在18xx年的美国完全就是赵本山在中国的形象:谁都会说几个段子、被各种改编(比如朱丽叶在罗密欧死之前就醒过来,或者犹太李尔王之类的)、在各种乡下演给农民看。后半段讲这种hierarchy是如何被建起来的,百老汇如何分化成了高端剧院和土鳖剧院。作者的观点摘要:归根结底,就是知识阶层在经济地位上不再突出之后(因为工业革命后中产阶级急剧增多),得找个辄让自己显得牛逼一点。
评分比预想的有意思,highbrow,lowbrow的词源尤其如此。学院cultural history的approach实在太明显,感觉如果写个new historicism的论文会被毙掉。。。
评分通过研究莎士比亚戏剧和意大利歌剧在美国的接受史,这本书提出美国文化在十九世纪末二十世纪初出现高雅和通俗的文化分层。观点固然有意思,但更有意思的是,书中竟然丝毫没有引用马克思,也无意于从社会层面解读分层的出现。这进而让人思考,美国文明史这个学科形成的社会背景和意义。
评分灰常有意思,前一半讲的就是莎士比亚戏剧在18xx年的美国完全就是赵本山在中国的形象:谁都会说几个段子、被各种改编(比如朱丽叶在罗密欧死之前就醒过来,或者犹太李尔王之类的)、在各种乡下演给农民看。后半段讲这种hierarchy是如何被建起来的,百老汇如何分化成了高端剧院和土鳖剧院。作者的观点摘要:归根结底,就是知识阶层在经济地位上不再突出之后(因为工业革命后中产阶级急剧增多),得找个辄让自己显得牛逼一点。
评分灰常有意思,前一半讲的就是莎士比亚戏剧在18xx年的美国完全就是赵本山在中国的形象:谁都会说几个段子、被各种改编(比如朱丽叶在罗密欧死之前就醒过来,或者犹太李尔王之类的)、在各种乡下演给农民看。后半段讲这种hierarchy是如何被建起来的,百老汇如何分化成了高端剧院和土鳖剧院。作者的观点摘要:归根结底,就是知识阶层在经济地位上不再突出之后(因为工业革命后中产阶级急剧增多),得找个辄让自己显得牛逼一点。
评分
评分
评分
评分
Highbrow/Lowbrow pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024