An illumination of one of the most explosive and publicized "holocaust trials" since that of Adolf Eichmann, by a leading historian who acted as chief adviser to the defense In ruling against the controversial historian David Irving, whose libel suit against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt was tried in April 2000, the High Court in London labeled Irving a falsifier of history. No objective historian, declared the judge, would manipulate the documentary record in the way that Irving did. Richard J. Evans, a Cambridge historian and the chief adviser for the defense, uses this famous trial as a lens for exploring a range of difficult questions about the nature of the historian's enterprise.
评分
评分
评分
评分
如果说这是一本对postmodernist history theory的rebuttal的话,很不成功。Manipulation of public moral pressure也正应了Foucault所说的"regime of truth"。
评分如果说这是一本对postmodernist history theory的rebuttal的话,很不成功。Manipulation of public moral pressure也正应了Foucault所说的"regime of truth"。
评分如果说这是一本对postmodernist history theory的rebuttal的话,很不成功。Manipulation of public moral pressure也正应了Foucault所说的"regime of truth"。
评分如果说这是一本对postmodernist history theory的rebuttal的话,很不成功。Manipulation of public moral pressure也正应了Foucault所说的"regime of truth"。
评分如果说这是一本对postmodernist history theory的rebuttal的话,很不成功。Manipulation of public moral pressure也正应了Foucault所说的"regime of truth"。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有