What are the secrets of successful teams? Why do some teams achieve remarkable success while others fail or are consigned to mediocrity? To find the answers, Carl E. Larson and Frank M. J. LaFasto conducted a three-year study of teams and team achievement. Interviewing a wide range of teams, including the space shuttle Challenger investigation team, executive management teams and a championship football team, Larson and LaFasto discovered a surprising consistency in the characteristics of effective teams. <br /><br />In <strong>Teamwork</strong>, they explore the eight properties of successful teams: a clear, elevating goal; a results-driven structure; competent team members; unified commitment; collaborative climate; standards of excellence; external support and recognition; and principled leadership. A final chapter examines the priority of the steps that lead to the building of a high performance team. The authors strive to make the concepts concrete, coupling solid theory with straightforward, practical advice on how to apply it and with lively, fascinating anecdotes. <br /><br />The volume will appeal to practitioners, scholars, and advanced students in the areas of organization studies and management, as well as interpersonal communication. <br /><br /><em>"We believe it is an important book that will be very useful to the sport psychology community. Its brief and readable nature makes it an ideal supplementary text for courses in the social psychology of sport or sport-related group dynamics. It could also be used in research methods courses to provide insight into qualitative data collection procedures. In addition, coaches and mental skills consultants will find much valuable information here about the evaluation and enhancement of team functioning. Finally, researchers will be intrigued by Larson and LaFasto's eight-category framework and their brief description of a rating-scale instrument designed to assess these dimensions of team effectiveness. Given this diversity of potential uses, we urge our colleagues to examine Teamwork for themselves."</em> <br />--The Sport Psychologist <br /><br /><em>"(A) superb effort conducted by the authors. . . . A must read."</em> <br />--HR Planning Newsletter <br /><br /><em>"<strong>Teamwork </strong>attempts an ambitious goal in a small number of pages and succeeds quite well. . . . The authors have useful and interesting things to say--things that fit well with what other studies and authors have concluded and with what the teams they studied experienced and concluded. A prime audience for this book would be managers and team members with a modest 'academic bent' who want guidance on how to make their teams work more effectively and who are willing to listen to the reasons why the authors make their suggestions and how they reach their conclusions. Students and academics who are looking for a wise and balanced attempt to capture what we seem to be learning about what works in groups should also find this refreshingly short volume valuable.</em>" <br />--Journal of Management <br /><br /><em>"Larson and LaFasto provide a brief, efficient, and well-focused checklist of principles for managing group processes. The authors report on the results of a relatively systematic, 3-year program on in-depth interviews with participants from 'successful teams'--e.g., a Mount Everest expedition; DeBakey-Cooley cardiac surgery teams; a Notre Dame championship football team; several business executive and project management teams; Presidential cabinets; and disaster response teams--to come up with some '. . . distinguishing features of effectively functioning teams. . . .' Practicing managers should have no difficulty identifying with anecdotes described in this book. A list of characteristics parallels the chapter outlines of this good organizational behavior textbook written from a management process perspective. . . . It is hard to imagine a more efficient way to capture the fundamentals than the way Larson and LaFasto have done it. Newly appointed supervisors without a formal organizational behavior and management process course--and any practicing manager who could use a quick brushup--will find this guidebook useful."</em> <br />--Human Resource Planning <br /><br /><em>"<strong>Teamwork</strong> [is] one of the best and most concise handbooks on team management around. No one interested in teamwork should miss reading this guide." <br /></em>--The Learning Edge
评分
评分
评分
评分
这部书的叙事节奏实在让人捉摸不透,仿佛作者在刻意拉长或压缩某些情节。开篇花了大量的笔墨去描绘主角们所处的那个小镇,那种沉闷、停滞不前的氛围塑造得极其到位,让你几乎能闻到空气中弥漫的霉味和未尽的期望。然而,当故事真正进入冲突点时,转折却来得猝不及防,几个关键人物之间的矛盾爆发得如同夏日午后的雷阵雨,来得猛烈但消散得也快,让人感觉力度没有完全施展开来。 尤其是对某个次要角色的内心挣扎,我期待看到更细腻的剖析,毕竟他似乎是推动后续事件的关键齿轮,但作者似乎急于将他推入下一个场景,导致他的动机显得有些单薄,像一张未经充分浸润的水彩纸,色彩的层次感不够丰富。书中的环境描写非常扎实,从破旧的码头到光线昏暗的咖啡馆,都栩栩如生,但这扎实的基础似乎并没有完全服务于人物弧光的打磨。我更希望看到环境如何反过来塑造人物的内心世界,而不是仅仅作为背景板存在。总体而言,这本书像是一幅构图精巧但着色略显仓促的油画,细节处有惊喜,但整体的呼吸感和推进力稍显欠缺,留下了许多可以深入挖掘的余韵。
评分这本书的结构布局给我留下了最深刻的印象,它采用了多重视角叙事,试图从不同人物的“眼睛”来审视同一个核心事件。理论上,这应该能提供一个全景式的、多维度的真相还原。然而,在实际阅读中,不同视角的切换显得有些生硬和突兀。视角之间的过渡缺乏平滑的桥梁,常常是前一秒还在A角色的内心独白中,下一秒就骤然跳跃到了B角色的外部观察,中间没有必要的过渡性文字来帮助读者重新定位和适应新的叙事声场。更令人困惑的是,尽管视角众多,但最终所有这些视角似乎都指向了一个非常平庸的结局,即“真相往往是多面且不可得的”。如果核心结论是如此的虚无,那么花费如此巨大的篇幅去搭建如此复杂、几乎可以说是精密的视角切换机制,其必要性就受到了挑战。我期待的是,多重视角能汇聚成一个更具穿透力的、超乎个体经验的洞察,而不是简单地重复“各说各词”的困境。
评分读完这本书,我有一种强烈的意犹未尽感,并非因为故事本身不够完整,而是作者在处理哲学思辨和日常琐碎的平衡上显得有些失衡。书中穿插了一些关于“存在主义”的探讨,那些关于选择与自由的段落,语句精炼,富有哲理,确实让人在深夜里停下来反复咀嚼。但这些深刻的思考往往在叙事推进到关键情节时突然被切断,生硬地插入一些家庭聚餐的场景,虽然这些场景描绘了生活真实的一面,但它们的篇幅和细节的刻画,远超出了服务于主题的必要性,反而稀释了前面建立起来的思辨张力。举个例子,关于“承诺的重量”这一主题,书中用了一个非常长的篇幅去描述一次无足轻重的争吵,而不是深入挖掘主角在面对一个重大人生抉择时的内心挣扎。这种处理方式使得全书的基调显得有些摇摆不定,时而高昂,时而又沉溺于对普通生活的冗余描绘。如果作者能更果断地取舍,将那些非核心的日常片段进行高度凝练,或许能让那些闪光的哲学火花更加耀眼夺目,而不是被日常的尘埃所掩盖。
评分这部作品的语言风格简直像是一场华丽的冒险,但这种华丽有时反而成了阅读的障碍。作者对词汇的运用极其考究,大量的比喻和拟人手法,使得许多句子读起来像是诗歌的片段,充满了异域情调和古典美感。我非常欣赏那种追求语言极致的匠心,比如描述一场追逐戏时,竟然用到了“时间如同被拉伸的琥珀,凝固着每一滴汗水的轨迹”这样的句子,极具画面冲击力。然而,这种过度雕琢带来的副作用是清晰度的下降。在一些需要快速理解信息流动的段落,比如技术性的讨论或者快速的对话交锋,作者依然坚持使用冗长而复杂的复合句,使得读者需要频繁回溯才能抓住核心意思。这就像是欣赏一件镶满了珠宝的盔甲,华美无比,但你很难想象穿着它上阵杀敌时的灵活性。我希望看到作者在保持其独特美学的基础上,能够稍微“做减法”,尤其是在叙事效率要求较高的部分,让读者可以更顺畅地沉浸于事件本身,而不是被困在词语的迷宫中。
评分我对角色塑造的复杂程度感到非常好奇,但这本书似乎在刻意回避提供明确的答案。书中塑造了几个极具争议性的角色,他们的行为逻辑在道德光谱的两端游走,让人难以简单地用“好人”或“坏人”来定义。这种模糊性本身是引人入胜的,它迫使读者不断地审视自己的道德底线。然而,随着故事的推进,我发现这种模糊性开始走向另一个极端——动机的缺失。关键角色的很多决定,尤其是那些导致了重大后果的行动,其内在驱动力在我的解读中始终是悬浮的。仿佛作者提供了角色行动的“结果”,却省略了导致行动的“起因”。这让我怀疑,这种刻意的“未完成感”是作者对人性深不可测的描绘,还是源于对人物内心世界构建的不充分?尤其是反派角色,他的邪恶似乎只停留在表面上的行为展示,缺乏一个令人信服的、深入骨髓的创伤或信念支撑,导致他更像是一个功能性的“恶之载体”,而非一个活生生的人。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有