Tonio Andrade is professor of history at Emory University and the author of Lost Colony: The Untold Story of China’s First Great Victory over the West (Princeton) and How Taiwan Became Chinese.
The Chinese invented gunpowder and began exploring its military uses as early as the 900s, four centuries before the technology passed to the West. But by the early 1800s, China had fallen so far behind the West in gunpowder warfare that it was easily defeated by Britain in the Opium War of 1839–42. What happened? In The Gunpowder Age, Tonio Andrade offers a compelling new answer, opening a fresh perspective on a key question of world history: why did the countries of western Europe surge to global importance starting in the 1500s while China slipped behind?
Historians have long argued that gunpowder weapons helped Europeans establish global hegemony. Yet the inhabitants of what is today China not only invented guns and bombs but also, as Andrade shows, continued to innovate in gunpowder technology through the early 1700s—much longer than previously thought. Why, then, did China become so vulnerable? Andrade argues that one significant reason is that it was out of practice fighting wars, having enjoyed nearly a century of relative peace, since 1760. Indeed, he demonstrates that China—like Europe—was a powerful military innovator, particularly during times of great warfare, such as the violent century starting after the Opium War, when the Chinese once again quickly modernized their forces. Today, China is simply returning to its old position as one of the world’s great military powers.
By showing that China’s military dynamism was deeper, longer lasting, and more quickly recovered than previously understood, The Gunpowder Age challenges long-standing explanations of the so-called Great Divergence between the West and Asia.
作者对中西方典籍很是熟悉,引用史料可谓详实,本书讲述了从火药的诞生到黑火药最后一次大规模运用于战争的发展历程。从火枪火炮在东方的首先运用再到东西方的并驾齐驱阶段,一直讲到东西分流,19世纪西方军事技术狂突猛进,把东亚远远的甩在身后,百年近代屈辱史讲的好,落后...
評分 評分- 從台灣'故事'網知道了《火藥時代》這本書,遂向樂文訂購,中間雖有些延誤,但也是支持獨立書店之選擇。 - 作者從戰爭史的角度,回顧火藥在歷史中國的應用,以及同期歐洲國家的狀況,偶爾也會(如談大砲)提及鄂圖曼帝國甚至殖民地前的印度在火藥上的應用。 - 作者的觀點認為...
評分 評分世界历史届一直有一个 Great Divergence Debate(大分流)的讨论,其中中心就是中国相对于欧洲是在什么时候、如何衰落的。其中一个分支问题就是中国的军事衰落是何时、如何发生的呢? 这本书提供了一部分答案: 1. 尽管很多人说明朝郑和下西洋的终结和明朝的闭关锁国是中国开始...
從軍事史角度分析中西大分流,這類學術書籍竟然意外的好讀,雖說作者的論點有待商榷,但論據確實讓我漲瞭不少知識
评分從軍事史角度分析中西大分流,這類學術書籍竟然意外的好讀,雖說作者的論點有待商榷,但論據確實讓我漲瞭不少知識
评分很受military revolution史觀影響。論點直接,認為中國曆史上戰爭頻繁的時期促進火藥武器發展,反之則阻礙。對比歐洲火藥武器發展史,考察發展路綫不同(歐洲的火炮和菱堡)以及中西交流和接觸衝突。認為盛清和平(乾隆後期到19世紀初)所緻的軍事落後造成鴉片戰爭落敗。
评分很受military revolution史觀影響。論點直接,認為中國曆史上戰爭頻繁的時期促進火藥武器發展,反之則阻礙。對比歐洲火藥武器發展史,考察發展路綫不同(歐洲的火炮和菱堡)以及中西交流和接觸衝突。認為盛清和平(乾隆後期到19世紀初)所緻的軍事落後造成鴉片戰爭落敗。
评分很受military revolution史觀影響。論點直接,認為中國曆史上戰爭頻繁的時期促進火藥武器發展,反之則阻礙。對比歐洲火藥武器發展史,考察發展路綫不同(歐洲的火炮和菱堡)以及中西交流和接觸衝突。認為盛清和平(乾隆後期到19世紀初)所緻的軍事落後造成鴉片戰爭落敗。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有