Can individuals be reformed or rehabilitated in the prison? A persistent body of work indicates that rehabilitation and/or reformation through incarceration is illusory. Exceptions, according to this view, are the result of accident, not design. For many practitioners in corrections systems, the incarceration of criminals is a "fact" and the task of prisons is to isolate, deter, and punish and only then, perhaps reform the criminal. In "Can Prison Work?" Stephen Duguid contends that both critics and defenders of incarceration have erred in making the prisoner the object rather than the subject of their discourse; the critics see prisoners as victims of a monstrous institution and the defenders view them as incorrigibles persuaded only by coercion or manipulation.</p>
Duguid begins by reviewing the philosophical and cultural contexts that led to the idea of "curing" criminals (in addition to deterring crime) through treatment and incarceration, presenting diverse historical commentaries from Plato and Socrates to former inmates. The two dominant approaches to modern corrections are also discussed, the one based on sociology and the one based on psychology - the latter being seen as responsible for the rise in the twentieth century of a medicalized approach to corrections.</p>
It was the collapse of this 'medical' model (in the 1970s) that created possibilities for innovative approaches in penology and four of these approaches are examined in some depth. Focusing on prisons with broadly conceived educational programs organized by people from outside the field of corrections, Duguid describes how programs in Canada, England, Scotland, and the United States were successful largely because the relationship with prisoner-students was built around notions of reciprocity, mutual respect, and individual development. Empirical data from an extensive follow-up study of the Canadian program is presented as evidence of the potential success using these kinds of approaches. In each of these cases, however, these programs, others like them, were eventually terminiated by prison authorities. The book concludes with the exploration of the tension between prison systems and outsiders engaged with programs within prisons. It argues against the re-emergence of a new medical model in favour of more humane - and human - approaches to individual change and reformation.</p>
Winner of the Harold Adams Innis Prize, awarded by the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences</p>
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书最让我感到震撼的,是它对“有效性”的质疑。它没有停留在对监狱的外部批评,而是深入到“功能性”的层面去审视。如果一个耗费巨资的社会干预系统,其主要功能不是预防未来的犯罪,而是稳定现有的社会阶层划分或者仅仅扮演一个“看不见的仓库”的角色,那么我们该如何定义它的成功或失败?作者似乎巧妙地运用了一种经济学的视角来审视社会正义问题,将惩罚的成本(包括对被惩罚者家庭和社区的长期影响)与预期的社会效益进行量化对比,这种冷峻的算术让人无法逃避。特别是关于替代性惩罚方案的讨论部分,它并非提出一套乌托邦式的完美替代品,而是基于现实资源限制,探讨了哪些微小但精准的干预措施可能比大规模监禁带来更高的社会回报率。这使得全书的基调显得非常务实,它不要求我们立即推翻一切,而是要求我们对投入产出比进行一次彻底的、痛苦的核算。
评分阅读体验上,这本书读起来有一种冰冷的、近乎手术刀般的精准感。语言克制而有力,避免了煽情或过度口号式的表达,这使得它在论证其观点时更具说服力。它不是一本旨在安抚读者的书,相反,它更像是一份对现有体系的“诊断报告”,精确地指出了病灶所在。从立法层面到一线执行层面,作者的考察细致入微,仿佛带领读者走进了那些我们通常避而不见的角落——从过度拥挤的候审室到那些看似为了“康复”实则效率低下的技能培训项目。这种多层次的叙事结构,将宏观的政策失灵与微观的个体经验巧妙地编织在一起,形成了一种强烈的张力。我印象特别深的是书中对“去人性化”过程的描述,它不仅仅关乎囚犯,也关乎那些日复一日处理人类悲剧的工作人员如何被体制塑形。整本书的节奏把握得极好,论据堆砌得层层递进,让人在不知不觉中被拉入作者设定的逻辑陷阱,最终不得不面对那些令人不安的结论。
评分这本著作的语言风格极其独特,它大量运用了历史参照和比较法学的方法,这使得它的论证框架显得无比坚固。它不像许多当代社会评论那样依赖情绪驱动,而是沉静地将当代问题置于更长远的历史轴线上进行考察,时不时地引用一些早期社会治理的文献,对比不同时代对“罪”与“罚”的定义是如何演变的。这种跨越时空的对话,赋予了文本一种古典的厚重感。通过这种对比,读者可以清晰地看到,我们今天深信不疑的许多惩戒理念,其实都是特定历史条件下的产物,而非永恒不变的真理。书中对于特定法律术语的溯源和剖析尤为精彩,它揭示了语言如何被用来固化权力关系。读到后面,我感觉自己仿佛在参与一场高级别的智力辩论,作者步步为营,每一步都有坚实的文献或案例支撑,让人在阅读过程中不断感到知识的积累和视野的拓展。
评分我必须承认,这本书的阅读门槛不低,它对读者的背景知识有一定的要求,但正是这种深度,成就了它的非凡价值。它完全避免了通俗读物中常见的对个体故事的过度渲染,而是聚焦于系统性的结构缺陷。全书的结构布局非常清晰,从理论基础的批判,到制度运行的剖析,再到对未来路径的审慎展望,逻辑链条紧密无间。尤其值得称赞的是,作者在构建其论点时,始终保持着一种批判性的谦逊,即承认人类社会治理的复杂性,不对任何单一方案抱有不切实际的幻想。它更像是一份邀请函,邀请那些真正关心社会正义和制度有效性的人,加入到这场艰难的、需要长期投入的理性思辨中来。读完后,我感到自己的思维被“重置”了,对于如何看待社会秩序的维护,有了一种更具批判性和层次感的认识,远远超出了阅读一本普通学术专著的体验。
评分这本书的探讨视角极为犀利,它没有落入常见的对监狱体制进行简单道德审判的窠臼,而是深入到惩罚背后的社会契约与权力结构之中。作者似乎在用一种近乎社会学田野调查的严谨态度,剖析了监禁这种制度是如何在现代社会中被建构、被合理化,以及它在实际操作层面是如何运行的。我特别欣赏它对“矫正”与“威慑”这两个核心概念的解构,那些看似坚不可摧的理论基石,在作者的笔下逐渐显露出其内在的矛盾与虚妄。例如,书中对不同类型犯罪者在不同监管环境下的长期追踪数据分析,提供了远超一般新闻报道的深度,揭示了体制内决策的盲点和路径依赖。它强迫读者跳出“罪犯就该关起来”的直觉反应,转而思考:我们希望通过这种昂贵的、高强度的社会隔离来实现什么目标?如果目标是降低再犯率,那么现有机制是否正在背道而驰地制造出更具破坏性的个体?这种对既有范式的持续挑战,使得阅读过程充满了智力上的兴奋感,让人不断地停下来,反思自己对公正与惩罚的理解是否过于肤浅。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有