具体描述
How Great Firms Fail By Doing Everything Right
Harvard professor Clayton M. Christensen demonstrates in the most revolutionary business book in years why outstanding companies that did everything right-were in tune with the competition, listened to customers, and invested aggressively in new technologies still lost their market leadership when confronted with disruptive changes in technology and market structure ... and he tells how to avoid a similar fate as business races online into the twenty-first century. The Innovator's Dilemma eloquently demonstrates a shattering paradox: that the best of conventional good business practices can ultimately weaken a great firm. There is a certain type of technological innovation that Christensen labels disruptive technology, which mainstream customers initially reject. Following these customers causes well-managed firms to allow strategic innovations to languish. The solution? Create a subsidiary entirely focused on the emerging market, one that is free to be visionary while courting an unorthodox customer base and staying poised to catch the next great wave of industry growth. Sharp, cogent, and provocative, The Innovator's Dilemma is one of the most talked about business books of our time-and something that none of today's executives will dare to be without.
作者简介
克莱顿•克里斯坦森：哈佛商学院教授，因其在企业创新方面的深入研究和独到见解，被尊称为“创新大师”。1997年，当《创新者的窘境》英文版出版时，克莱顿•克里斯坦森只是哈佛商学院的助理教授。而此书一出，就确立了他在创新技术管理领域的权威地位
目录信息
读后感
所谓的“窘境”，就是说管理良好的企业，由于它的管理良好，使得它对于一个特定的“价值网”，我更愿意叫它“生态系统”，而成功，也正是由于它的管理良好，或者说，是对于某生态系统的过度优化，使得它对于另一个特定的“生态系统”，会遭遇失败。这也就是《浪潮之巅》里说的...
看完前三章节，大概看出本书的“创新者”所指为成功企业里的创新者，而非新兴企业的创新者，《浪潮之巅》一书描述的大多数企业都是被一种叫做“破坏性技术”的市场替代；《精益创业》中，新兴创业企业是如何更快的更高效的，可能是以破坏性技术，迅速占领市场，逐步走向成功。 ...
呵呵，要比蓝海战略好不知道多少。我前年读的英文版，见人就推荐。 Paradigm Shift相关的书里面，Crossing the Chasm, Inside the Tornado和这本书是俺最为推荐的三本。 当然，不知道这本书的中译本怎样，希望听到反馈。
本书的逻辑： 一些大公司无法成功利用颠覆性的技术变革，不是因为他们无意识，技术能力不够，没有开发相关产品，没有适合的人才，没有投入资源； 而是因为： 1 目标依然锁定在现有市场，新技术仍用于满足现有用户需求和在现有市场中争抢份额，造成新生产品“没有市场”的错觉 -...
用户评价
Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
