International Record Review May, 2003
"MacDonald’s thorough research and perceptive commentary put us all in his debt . . . [an] observant analysis."
Synopsis
The works of Edgard Varese (1883-1965) represent the most radical expression of 20th-century Modernism in music. Not only did he create such orchestral showpieces as "Ameriques" and "Arcana" and such mainstays of the instrumental repertoire as "Octandre" and "Density 21:5"; he also pioneered works for percussion ensemble and electronic music, both on tape and using electronic instruments. Yet books about Varese are few. Either they are biographical studies by non-musicians, or severely analytical treatises beyond the reach of the majority of music lovers who are likely to hear his works in concert. This book takes a different approach. Within a chronological scheme, its core is a series of descriptive analyses; accessible to any literate music-lover, of all Varese's available works. Malcolm MacDonald relates them to the ideas, both aesthetic and scientific, which underlay Varese's boldly original view of sound and musical structure. He shows how Varese's conception of a music that "explodes into space", of "intelligent sounds moving in space" arose from 20th-century man's expanding consciousness of his place in the universe, but also from the esoteric philosophies of late 19th-century Paris, inspired by Renaissance alchemists such as Paracelsus. Much of Varese's output is destroyed, but it is possible to infer much about his lost early works, his vast stage of composition about communication with the star Sirius, and the unachieved choral symphony "Espace", designed to be performed simultaneously in the various capitals of the world. This is also the first book to discuss the previously unpublished Varese scores released for performance in 1998 by Varese executor Chou Wen Chung(周文中?).
评分
评分
评分
评分
这部作品的书名,像是一枚精心打磨的、带着异域气息的徽章,立刻吸引了那些对边缘文化和非主流思想抱有执着兴趣的读者。它暗示着一种对主流叙事范式的公然反叛。在我的想象中,这本书不会满足于简单的传记叙事,它更可能是一场对“何为艺术的真理”的诘问。我期待看到作者如何解构传统音乐理论的僵化框架,转而引入更具流体性和动态性的概念来描述这位艺术家的工作。这本书的魅力可能在于其“不可译性”——它所探讨的主题本身就难以用清晰的语言完全捕捉。因此,作者的文笔必然需要具备一种罕见的透明度和弹性,既能承载深奥的理论分析,又不会让读者迷失在术语的迷宫中。我推测,书中可能会穿插大量的艺术家本人的手稿节选、未发表的笔记,甚至是模糊的图表和符号系统,这些“非文字信息”或许才是理解其思想的关键线索。这本书如果成功,它将成为一个知识的棱镜,将单一的光束折射出光谱般丰富而迷离的意义。
评分这本书的书名散发出一种强烈的、偏执的专注感。它不仅仅是对一个艺术家的描摹,更像是在描绘一种极端的工作状态——那种完全沉浸于某种特定频率或波段的、近乎冥想式的探索。我预感这本书的叙事节奏可能会非常独特,可能不是线性的时间推进,而是围绕几个核心的声音概念进行螺旋式、层层深入的阐释。这种结构往往考验作者的驾驭能力,稍有不慎便会显得重复和冗余。我更希望看到一种充满内在张力的文本,在精确的科学术语与狂热的艺术激情之间不断拉扯、平衡。这本书或许会涉及对“噪音”的重新定义,将那些被传统音乐排斥的、混乱的频率视为宇宙最真实的声音表达。如果作者能成功地将这种“非和谐”转化为一种新的和谐,那么这本书的价值就远超出了音乐评论的范畴,它触及到了我们对秩序与混沌的基本认知。我期望它能像一首复杂的赋格曲,结构严密,层次丰富,每一次重读都能发现新的连接点。
评分我对于这本书所能提供的“体验”抱有极高的期待,它听起来像是一次智力上的探险。一个“天文学家”在“声音”中的角色定位,强烈暗示了一种自上而下的、宏观的视角与微观的、触觉般的感知的结合。我希望作者能够避免将这种结合写成肤浅的类比,而是真正挖掘出两者之间深层的、结构性的共通之处。例如,宇宙背景辐射与特定频率的白噪音之间是否存在某种可被音乐语言捕捉的共振?或者,星体运行的轨道几何学,能否直接转化为乐谱上的节奏模式?如果作者能够提供一些具体的案例分析,展示这位艺术家是如何将望远镜捕捉到的数据转化为听众可以感知的声景,那将是极具说服力的。我更倾向于那些用清晰的逻辑链条来支撑其宏大论断的作品,我希望这本书能在我读完之后,留下一种“豁然开朗”的感觉,仿佛我突然获得了监听宇宙电磁波的“超能力”。它应该是一本能改变你日后听音乐方式的书。
评分坦率地说,初次接触这本书的书名时,我脑海中浮现的是一种近乎“冷峻”的学术氛围。这可能源于“天文学家”这一身份所自带的精确与客观性,与“声音”这一介质可能蕴含的流动与主观性之间的张力。我猜想,这本书的文字风格必然是极其考究的,每一个词汇的选择都可能像精密仪器测量数据一般,不容有失。我尤其关注作者如何处理叙事节奏。是如同慢镜头般细致入微地剖析每一个音符的意义,还是采取一种快节奏的、类似交响乐的结构,在不同主题间频繁跳跃,以模仿某种复杂的声场构建?如果作者是一位音乐哲学家,那么本书可能会深入探讨时间、频率与空间的关系,试图论证音乐的结构是否暗合了宇宙的运行规律。如果作者更偏向于艺术史学家,那么我们或许能看到一条清晰的脉络,展示这位“声音中的天文学家”是如何受到特定历史时期科学发现的影响,并将其融入其创作实践。无论如何,这本书给我的第一印象是:它绝不是一本轻松的读物,它要求读者以一种近乎献祭般的心态去投入,去接受那些可能颠覆日常感官经验的复杂信息流。
评分这部作品,单看书名,便能感受到一股扑面而来的、对既有认知的挑战。它似乎在试图搭建一座桥梁,连接看似风马牛不相及的两个领域:浩瀚无垠的宇宙探索,以及对声音本质的极致解构。我期待阅读过程中,作者如何巧妙地将天文学的严谨逻辑与声音艺术的抽象表达熔铸一炉。这种跨学科的叙事角度,往往能带来意想不到的哲学反思,让人重新审视我们感知世界的方式。也许,作者会探讨那些我们习以为常的“寂静”之中,究竟隐藏着多少宇宙尺度的回响,或是如何将那些遥远星体的光信号转化为可被人类听觉系统捕获的“旋律”。我特别好奇,作者在描述这些概念时,是否会大量引用具体的声学理论、作曲家的技法,还是更多地诉诸于一种诗意的、象征性的语言来描绘这种“声音中的天文学家”的内在世界。如果处理得当,这本书将不仅仅是一本关于特定艺术家的传记或评论,而更像是一部关于感知边界的思辨录。我希望它能拓宽我对于“聆听”这一行为的理解,将听觉从单纯的物理现象提升到一种形而上的探索维度。
评分A composer knows about as little as anyone else about where the substance of his work come from.
评分A composer knows about as little as anyone else about where the substance of his work come from.
评分A composer knows about as little as anyone else about where the substance of his work come from.
评分A composer knows about as little as anyone else about where the substance of his work come from.
评分A composer knows about as little as anyone else about where the substance of his work come from.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有