When his sexton finds a corpse in the wrong grave, the rector of Fenchurch St Paul asks Lord Peter Wimsey to find out who the dead man was and how he came to be there. The lore of bell-ringing and a brilliantly-evoked village in the remote fens of East Anglia are the unforgettable background to a story of an old unsolved crime and its violent unravelling twenty years later.
具體描述
讀後感
好多人都在骂 有说翻译的不好 有说塞耶斯文笔不好的 还有说读不下去的云云 不过自己却是很喜欢 看完找来原著看了下 其实翻译没有太多的差异 细节上确有不足 不过我对翻译一直没有那么挑剔 而且迷题也确实很巧妙 就买来收藏了 有耐性的同志可以试试
評分这本书我是一个晚上浏览完的。平心而论，构思有可取之处，但是其文字真是“不忍卒读”。 看了几部群众版的塞耶斯系列，学乖了。读塞耶斯不能像读阿加莎、铁伊等女作家的小说一样细细看，必须跳过大量无关宏旨的议论和枝蔓，快速浏览。打个比方，骑自行车必须保持一定的速度，才...
評分由於群衆版已經惡評如潮，出於不破壞這部經典名著的心情，我買了臉譜的版本——但就在準備看的前一陣，突然就中了某篇惡劣書評的雷，把<非自然死亡 >和這本的底一塊瀉了……雖然沒點名，但是桃樂絲·塞耶斯的詭計之獨特，可是一眼就知道是哪本書的-_-||| Who, Why, How，溫西爵...
評分过多的模仿福尔摩斯的痕迹。 翻译太差，以至于很多读者在尸体出现前放弃了阅读（上图的书，前百页略旧，后面崭新），变奏鸣钟这东西，大家都不太了解，出场人物又过于集中过于多，要想勾住读者的心，翻译很重要。 53页15行，“当泽佩林来的时候，我们真的感到非常害怕”。 69页...
評分读书之前听说这本书是塞耶斯的最高杰作。所以对这本书期望很高，毕竟能和阿婆齐名的作家不可能没有点儿真本事的。结果却我略感失望了。 其实这本书情节还是很不错的，塞耶斯写作功力果然不同一般，人物、景色描写很细腻。但是这部书有个关键的硬伤，就是推理大多靠...
用戶評價
12.8.28 More literature than mystery. More history than killings. More howdunit than whodunit. Still, I enjoyed it. One of her best.
评分12.8.28 More literature than mystery. More history than killings. More howdunit than whodunit. Still, I enjoyed it. One of her best.
评分12.8.28 More literature than mystery. More history than killings. More howdunit than whodunit. Still, I enjoyed it. One of her best.
评分12.8.28 More literature than mystery. More history than killings. More howdunit than whodunit. Still, I enjoyed it. One of her best.
评分12.8.28 More literature than mystery. More history than killings. More howdunit than whodunit. Still, I enjoyed it. One of her best.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有