On the basis of a cross-linguistic study of over 250 languages, this book brings to light several fascinating characteristics of pronouns. It argues that these words do not form a single category, but rather two different categories called 'personal pronouns' and 'proforms'. It points out several differences between the two, such as the occurrence of a dual structure among proforms but not among personal pronouns. These differences are shown to derive from the distinct functions that the two categories have to perform in language. The book also shows that the so-called interrogative pronouns of familiar languages do not actually have interrogation as their meaning. One can only assign the meaning of indefiniteness to them. Further, the notion of indefiniteness that can be associated with these and other pronouns is quite different from the one that can be associated with noun phrases. Other interesting aspects of this book include the postulation of certain typological distinctions like 'two-person' and 'three-person' languages and 'free-pronoun' and 'bound-pronoun' languages.
最后两段,相当欢乐(但貌似国外的书评都很犀利啊)。不过总体上看,Bhat的宏观眼光还是很不错的。这本书最好能结合着Corbett的Numbers跟Siewieska的Person一起读。 PS:书评不能放图片,所以把表1和表2挪到笔记中了,不方便之处请大家谅解。 ————————————————...
评分最后两段,相当欢乐(但貌似国外的书评都很犀利啊)。不过总体上看,Bhat的宏观眼光还是很不错的。这本书最好能结合着Corbett的Numbers跟Siewieska的Person一起读。 PS:书评不能放图片,所以把表1和表2挪到笔记中了,不方便之处请大家谅解。 ————————————————...
评分最后两段,相当欢乐(但貌似国外的书评都很犀利啊)。不过总体上看,Bhat的宏观眼光还是很不错的。这本书最好能结合着Corbett的Numbers跟Siewieska的Person一起读。 PS:书评不能放图片,所以把表1和表2挪到笔记中了,不方便之处请大家谅解。 ————————————————...
评分最后两段,相当欢乐(但貌似国外的书评都很犀利啊)。不过总体上看,Bhat的宏观眼光还是很不错的。这本书最好能结合着Corbett的Numbers跟Siewieska的Person一起读。 PS:书评不能放图片,所以把表1和表2挪到笔记中了,不方便之处请大家谅解。 ————————————————...
评分最后两段,相当欢乐(但貌似国外的书评都很犀利啊)。不过总体上看,Bhat的宏观眼光还是很不错的。这本书最好能结合着Corbett的Numbers跟Siewieska的Person一起读。 PS:书评不能放图片,所以把表1和表2挪到笔记中了,不方便之处请大家谅解。 ————————————————...
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有